One of Topman’s latest from the Summer 2013 range, is this basic Men’s tee displaying Ganesh, the Hindu deity of Knowledge. However, how many people who buy this tee will know this? How many will understand the background to this image?
Throughout the 21st Century, religious symbols/images have been commercialised and mass produced. The Christian Cross is a prime example of this. You’re not a rock star if you aren’t seen sporting a Cross Pendant… even Bollywood actors have started accessorising, regardless of their religion. This will always be controversial and will always have people on both sides saying it is either blasphemy or just freedom of expression. However, the point I wish to make, free from a religious point of view on my part, is that of Corporate Responsibility.
One defense of this view, would be that of cultural appropriation – adoption of a culture by another culture. However, here, we would be getting into a messy web of differences between culture and religion. Should Ganesh’s image be printed on an item of Indian clothing, then yes, you could say it is cultural appropriation. However, this tee is a modern item of clothing.
So why do I think this is a case of Corporate Responsibility? Because this level of controversy acts against a “regulation of social good” that businesses should ethically adhere to. I put it in the same basket as Primark selling kid’s padded bikinis. Nothing can really stop it, but it’s just not right.
To me, this tee shirt is a symbol of a religion. Wearing it requires the respect of the traditions and values held by that religion. Mass-producing this image onto a mainstream item of clothing, to me, effectively diminishes the meaning behind it. Although the UK is multi-cultural, it is not yet socially aware enough to be ready for this type of commercialisation. It won’t be long until you see young people wearing it while obliviously eating a beefy Big Mac. This wouldn’t be out of direct disrespect, but out of a lack of knowledge and appreciation. It is about as socially aware as a person, wearing a peace sign t-shirt, casually car-jacking.
On a practical note, I don’t think that the tee will do that well and feel that it is a terrible addition to the summer line. After showing the image to many of my friends, the general response has been, “..but who would wear that, though?”. Stick to the retro look, Topman.
Over and Out.
Pingback: Topman Design Spring 2013 | Through Ian's Eyes.
From your post I assume this means you are against the production of this sort of design on clothing. To which I agree with you, society isn’t ready aside for the minority who are. The anecdote of a person wearing it at McDonald’s pushes your point very well.
And from a purely aesthetic point of view, well its a fine line between looking whimsical/summery and looking busy/cheap.
and Topman missed the mark.
Definitely! I’m against the commercialisation of this sort of imagery on mainstream clothing and against the contention that it is cultural appropriation. Glad you understand the sensitivities!
Thank you for visiting and reading 😀
Pingback: Nirbhaya: A reflective review, as featured in Nada Brahma | ADoseofPersonalWhim